It shows the unique sonic signature of the highly sought-after AKG C12, which enables lead vocals and solo instruments to be placed even in a dense mix. 15 comments. I would not say one is better than the other; it really comes down to the application and what your looking for. Stolze neun Richtcharakteristiken zwischen Kugel, Niere und Acht, ein Lowcut-Filter, das wahlweise bei 40 Hz, … The term plasticy used earlier perfectly describes the new 414s. It’s slightly warmer than the XLII. I don't know the market for them today, so I don't know if $700 is a good price, but I would pay it in a second if I had to replace this one. heh. Don't the EB's use a real C12 capsule? Is there much of a sound difference when it comes to vocals for both of the condensers? Cap,FET, Traffo. Another vote for the older EB. I've heard the new 414's and I don't care for them. This thread is archived. I was very disappointed. I had the XLII and it was so bad I practically gave it away. Older is better. How it compares to the 414 XLII? better for vocals. Well regardless of what people think of this Mic, you can't beat this price with a stick. I am not sure what capsule it has. At $700 no AKG 414 is a good deal not even a new in the box XLII. If you prefer a slightly warmer sound, the XLS will do the trick. While AKG has retired most of the C414 lines in its cabinet, it currently sells two versions: the XLS and XLII. Designed for accurate reproduction and transparency, the AKG C414 XLS features the same capsule as the popular C414 B-ULS. The mic sounded so much better than with the Nylon CK12. Or is there very little in difference between the two? The mics are pretty similar in their overall frequency response and feature identical controls and features. which causes this. Someone has offered to sell me one of the older silver "EB" models for $700 usd, but I have no idea how it compares to the newer ones. If you need a brighter sound, the XL II is your best bet. If it is red-ish in color, it's the newer capsule. Like I said before the newer gold ones have a raise that is designed for vocals. Try the mic in question and see if you like it!! hide. Would do well as your primary all-rounder. Thankfully, he's been able to take care of some major issues that were plaguing it. I had the XLII and it was so bad I practically gave it away. For live sound applications and permanent installations, all controls can easily be disabled for trouble-free use. So what capsule did the 414 Comb have? I just bought a 414B-ULS for $500 from one of the folks here on this board. i.e. They seem to be pretty flat across the spectrum which make the silver ones or ULS good for instruments for a very even sound. share. Come up with $300 more and get yourself a good used tube mic. Hey all. Or the C12? I have an EB and I wouldn't sell it. The XLII has a version of the classic 414 rise from 5k up - which is what we were accustomed to hearing from a 414. The AKG C414 XLII and XLS keep the classic shape that its predecessors have become famous for. My EB sounds really open and natural, especially in omni. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. One of them is the XLII that we’ve talking about here and the other one is the XLS. So i have been using the akg c414 xls for quite some time for vocal recordings. It's not the color, a 414 EB with the C12 brass capsule , the ring is ''brass '' and the 414 EB with the teflon capsule is , guess what........... teflon ring...... yotonic I had the XLII and it was so bad I practically gave it away. Is the guy offering to sell me this mic completely out of reality with his pricing? Bascially the 4047 has more weight in the lower mids. The EB's are pretty bright to my ears, but in a good usable way. Although the design is basic, the beautiful gold grille found on the C414 XLII, makes this microphone appear quite flashy when in the studio. The XLS is more neutral and transparent-sounding when compared to the XLII. But it does seem like I've heard of these being a little tempermental. Beide Modelle bieten umfassende Möglichkeiten, um sich an unterschiedlichste Aufnahmesituationen anzupassen. One of each is not a bad idea for variety, but a matched stereo pair of one or the other would seem to be a more sensible choice. I had to replace the capsule in '91, but the electronics are all original. I would think if they previously had a transformer, it would be similar to a comparison of a AT 4033 (transformerless) and 4047 (transformer built in). Besides the two models’ minor cosmetic differences, the main component that sets them apart is the capsule design. channel strip and it sounded amazing. I did a search here on gearslutz and someone had picked up a pair for quite a bit less than this. Someone has offered to sell me one of the older silver "EB" models for $700 usd, but I have no idea how it compares to the newer ones. report. There alone is your choice. The older mics are usually very simple. AKG C414-EB vs C414 XLS or XLII I have been thinking of picking up one of the new AKG C414's after being impressed with it during a friends session. instrument, the new C414 XLS combines proven reference quality, leading-edge technology and state-of-the-art components. However, the C414 XLII has the same capsule design as the legendary C12, giving it a 3kHz presence … A slight additional lift above 3kHz gives this model a slightly more airy and open top end that is useful when miking vocals to capture a contemporary 'crisp' sound, or when miking instruments … Comparison in a nutshell: AKG C414 XLS: bright, but more of a workhorse mic. I have an EB and a ULS, and I definitely prefer the EB. All the 414's I have heard were transformerless. C414 Capsules Explained. The C414 has two versions. I traded an SPX-90 for it (back in the day) with a friend who owned a studio- good trade. I just recently recapped a 414EB and changed out the capsule to Tim Campbell's CT12. The C414 XLII is the successor of the famous C414 B-TL II. IMHO it is more likely the electronics, particularly the absence of transformers etc. akg c414 XLS vs C414 XLII? The EB I tested was a 414EB, silver. Hey there! The appearance of the C414 begins with its compact, somewhat box-shaped design. But there are a few important distinctions, mostly concerning the way they cover the frequencies. I found a Pearlman TM-1 for $1100 and it was the difference between pro gear and prosumer versus the XLII. If it is black in color, then it is the original "brass' capsule. I was very disappointed. If its a goood mic I would love to save the money off buying a new one, but at the same time I dont want ot end up with an old mic within a couple of years of the end of its life just to save a couple hundred bucks. There was an added depth and detail that is missing in the nylon capsule. I think the EB is really an older mic. It's a little darker than the ULS, and just sounds a little warmer overall. I had an opportunity to test this old myth on several occasions. http://www.akg.com/products//powersl...nguage,EN.html, http://www.akg.com/mediadatabase/psf...5c0ffc4faf.pdf, AKG C414B XLII Microphone 414 B XLII c414bXLII C 414B - eBay (item 220685079765 end time Nov-18-10 02:00:00 PST), http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/nov0...es/akgmics.htm, Slate Digital Launches The VIRTUAL MICROPHONE SYSTEM. I was very disappointed. I have an EB with the ck12 capsule on it... it's presently being cleaned up by Klaus. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. AKG C414 XLII Vs XLS. The AKG C414 XLII and XLS keep the classic shape that its predecessors have become famous for. The C414 XLII version differs from the C414 XLS version in one major respect – the capsule. 79% Upvoted . The C414 XLS (left) is more transparent sounding than the C414 XLII, but the latter has a presence boost similar to the legendary C12, which makes it quite flattering on many sources. I'd recommend it to anyone wanting a great sounding, versatile mic. The EB Capsule? Photo: Mike Cameron In fact there are two new C414s, the C414B XLS and the C414 XLII, though the only performance difference between the two models is that the XLII has a more pronounced presence peak than the XLS. I found a Pearlman TM-1 for $1100 and it was the difference between pro gear and prosumer versus the XLII. I'm looking to purchase a pair of C414's - factory matched if available. The new ones have the same sonic idea basically, but they sound, I don't know, kind of "plasticky", if that makes sense. Come up with $300 more and get yourself a good used tube mic. Just a friendly reminder that political discussion, (including "offhand" and 'sideways' commenting) is. A friend of mine has one and it sounds great. He has also informed me that the tension on the diaphragms are very good. The appearance of the C414 begins with its compact, somewhat box-shaped design. If you prefer a I would get a matched pair of C414xls's if given no other option. The C414 XLII's slight presence boost and impressive spatial reproduction are both similar to the legendary AKG C12 microphone from 1953.” Das AKG C414 XLS bietet im Gegensatz zur etwas teureren XLII-Variante einen etwas dunkleren Klang und präsentiert sich damit in einem etwas entspannteren Klanggewand.